Key takeaways:
- Property opportunities are evolving – The end of new LRBAs for ordinary residential investment property has shifted the focus from meeting deadlines to understanding what investment opportunities remain.
- Funding matters as much as compliance – A strategy may meet regulatory requirements, but lender appetite and access to finance are becoming increasingly important considerations.
- Strategy is back at the centre – Advice is moving beyond property selection to focus on long-term retirement objectives, funding viability and the right structure for each client’s needs.
The lead-up to the 10 August deadline was defined by urgency.
As the commencement date for restrictions on new residential property LRBA’s approached, financial professionals faced a surge in enquiries, anxious clients and a rush of transactions aimed at beating the changes.
Speaking in a panel session on Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements (LRBAs) at the recent Class Ignite conference, WT Wealth Head of Financial Services Scott Averay said he spent “four or six hours a day on the phone” helping clients understand what the reforms meant and whether they needed to act before the deadline.
However, once the deadline rush passed, attention shifted from what had changed to the opportunities that still exist for SMSF property investors.
Commercial property comes into focus
Business real property, often including commercial premises used wholly and exclusively in business, has become an area of increased interest following the changes.
However, financial professionals caution against viewing it as a straightforward replacement for residential assets. SMSF technical specialist Julie Steed noted that commercial property was “not necessarily a good substitute for residential”.
She said while both sit within the property universe, the investment dynamics are very different. Residential investors are often focused on capital growth, whereas commercial property introduces considerations such as tenant quality, lease structures, vacancy periods and fit-out costs.
The learning curve for SMSF trustees on the differences between the two property classes can be significant. Most have experience with residential property through home ownership or investment properties, but comparatively little exposure to commercial assets.
As Averay observed, Australians understand “bricks and mortar homes”, yet “very few have actually touched commercial”.
For financial professionals, it means the conversation with SMSF trustees is increasingly centred on education. The question is not whether commercial property can replace residential property, but whether it aligns with a client’s objectives, risk tolerance and retirement strategy.
Borrowing may be possible, but funding is another question
According to the panel, one of the most significant themes emerging from the reforms is the growing importance of lender appetite.
Historically, SMSF property strategies were assessed through a regulatory lens. If a structure complied with the rules, the next step was securing finance. Increasingly, however, access to funding is becoming a key constraint.
The challenge is that lender assessments do not always align neatly with definitions of business real property. A property may satisfy that definition yet still raise lender concerns because of its residential characteristics. As Your Future Strategy Managing Director Gareth Croy noted, certain properties may technically qualify even though they effectively “look and smell like a house”.
The panel also noted lender appetite was already narrowing well before the deadline took effect. Many financiers had reduced their willingness to fund assets with a residential component, including some agricultural properties that would previously have attracted lending. The result is a growing disconnect between what may be legally permissible and what lenders are prepared to support.
The lending landscape itself is also narrowing. While major SMSF lenders are expected to remain active, financial professionals expect several second and third-tier lenders to exit the sector. For trustees, fewer lenders could mean reduced competition, tighter credit policies, and fewer financing options.
That uncertainty is particularly relevant where an SMSF exchanged a binding contract to acquire real property before 10 August 2026, but settlement may still be six to 12 months away. While the arrangement may qualify for transition treatment, securing finance at settlement could remain a challenge.
As commercial lending options narrow, related-party lending may become more relevant for some trustees. However, the same business real property restriction applies regardless of the lender, and related-party arrangements carry additional compliance obligations.
Why structure and documentation matter
The growing relevance of related-party lending is bringing renewed attention to safe harbour arrangements and the consequences of getting them wrong.
Steed warned that compliance failures can have serious implications where non-arm’s length income provisions apply. In those circumstances, trustees risk undermining the economics of the entire strategy through a significantly higher tax burden. “You’ve blown up your entire strategy because you’ve now got a 45% tax rate,” she said.
The same emphasis on documentation applies to existing and eligible transitional arrangements. Refinancing may still be available for existing LRBAs, but trustees should retain clear evidence that the original arrangement was entered into before 10 August 2026. Contracts, loan agreements and supporting records that may have seemed routine at the time can become critical years later.
A return to strategy
Despite the reforms, interest in SMSFs remains strong, with Steed acknowledging “SMSFs are here to stay.”
What is changing is not investor demand but the nature of the advice itself. Rather than centring conversations on a specific property purchase or borrowing opportunity, financial professionals are increasingly returning to first principles, focusing on retirement objectives, portfolio construction and long-term outcomes.
Viewed through that lens, the significance of the reforms extends well beyond the borrowing arrangements they accelerated. They have prompted a broader reassessment of how SMSF property advice is delivered, placing greater emphasis on funding viability, structure and strategic fit. For investors navigating a changing landscape, those considerations may prove more important than the deadline itself.
About HUB24
HUB24 Limited is listed on the Australian Securities Exchange, and includes the award-winning HUB24 Platform, Class, NowInfinity and myprosperity.
The HUB24 Platform offers advisers and their clients a comprehensive range of investment options, including market-leading managed portfolio solutions, and enhanced transaction and reporting functionality. As one of the fastest growing platforms in the market, the platform is recognised for providing choice and innovative product solutions that create value for advisers and their clients.
Class is a pioneer in cloud-based wealth accounting software and is recognised as one of Australia’s most innovative technology companies. Class delivers SMSF administration, trust accounting, portfolio management, legal documentation and corporate compliance solutions to financial professionals across Australia who depend on Class to drive business automation, increase profitability and deliver better client service.
myprosperity is a leading provider of client portals for accountants and financial advisers, enabling streamlined service delivery, increased productivity and enhanced customer experience for finance professionals and their clients.
For further information about HUB24, please visit www.HUB24.com.au
For further information about Class, please visit www.class.com.au
Disclaimer
The information contained in this document is provided by Class Pty Limited (ABN 70 116 802 058) and its subsidiaries (collectively, Class) and is current as at 15 September 2026. It is factual information only and is not intended to be financial product advice, legal advice or tax advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This information is general in nature and may omit detail that could be significant to your particular circumstances. This information is provided in good faith and derived from sources believed to be accurate and current at the date of publication. The information given in this document is in summary form and does not purport to be complete. While reasonable care has been taken to ensure the information is correct at the time of publishing, superannuation and tax legislation and circumstances can change from time to time. Accordingly, neither Class nor any of its related bodies corporate make any representations or warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of the information in this document and none of these entities is liable for any loss arising from reliance on this information, including reliance on information that is no longer current. We recommend that you seek appropriate professional advice before making any financial decisions. Links to third-party websites are inserted for your convenience, but do not constitute endorsement of material on those sites or the relevant providers.